Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Alabama

Aptar CSP Technologies 960

Name: Aptar CSP Technologies 960 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Auburn, AL · ~238 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Aptar CSP Technologies 960: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 safety composite

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2020→2021

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 injury rate improved

Aptar CSP Technologies 960's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.6 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.6 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Auburn, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

DART 0.4 DART
RANK #7/65
PHOTO The NOCO Company
BOOK 2y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The NOCO Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.2
The NOCO Compa

1.2
Troy Plant

1.2
Cascade Engine

1.2
Fabri-Kal Corp

1.2

What this shows Aptar CSP Technologies 960 averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 TCR series: 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Aptar CSP Technologies 960 falls in its industry

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 65 Cups, plastics (except foam), employers in Alabama.

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 (238 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Aptar CSP Technologies 960 has more employees than the Cups, plastics (except foam), manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	0.8	0.4	2	0	0
2020	1.6	0.8	4	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · AL · Auburn

2,838 Cups, plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	The NOCO Company	GLENWILLOW, OH	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Troy Plant	TROY, MI	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cascade Engineering	GRAND RAPIDS, MI	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fabri-Kal Corporation-Mountain Top, PA	MOUNTAIN TOP, PA	1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	WM 432	TALLADEGA	238 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Redstone Village	HUNTSVILLE	238 FTE
STATE-SIZE	World Pet Care	RED BAY	237 FTE
STATE-SIZE	OPELIKA, AL	OPELIKA	237 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Briggs & Stratton	Auburn	602 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4021-000017263	Auburn	456 FTE
CITY-NEAR	000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING	Auburn	432 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 356	Auburn	344 FTE
NAT-TCR	Soundview Paper Company - Elmwood Park	Elmwood Park, NJ	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Newell Brands Fishers	Fishers, IN	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Slay	Pasadena, TX	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hoffman Enclosures Inc	Anoka, MN	1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Center of Hope Foundation, Inc.	Southbridge, MA	238 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cooper Drive	Elkhart, IN	238 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Huntington 770	Huntington, NY	238 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mohegan Sun Arena	Wilkes-Barre, PA	238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.