Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin

Arbon Milwaukee

Milwaukee, WI · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbon Milwaukee runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Arbon Milwaukee: 2.2 TCR = 103% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbon Milwaukee safety composite

Arbon Milwaukee scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arbon Milwaukee: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Arbon Milwaukee's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/87
  • PHOTO Mauser Packaging Sol…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mauser Packaging Solutions, Oakbrook Transportation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Arbon Milwaukee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbon Milwaukee averages 2.2 TCR (103% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbon Milwaukee TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Arbon Milwaukee falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 87 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Wisconsin.

Arbon Milwaukee (41 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbon Milwaukee
Arbon Milwaukee (41 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Arbon Milwaukee has fewer employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WI · Milwaukee

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mauser Packaging Solutions, Oakbrook Transportation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Trailer Services 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GT&E - Harmony 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AirMasters, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunVest Solar LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mineral Point Operations Bldg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Construction Inc. - Ashland, WI 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger - P&G Green Bay 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR 350 RI Uber 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SPT 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Childrens Hospital - F/N 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fortis Solutions Group (West Chester) 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas I 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN - Altria 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ram Tool Construction Supply Company - Tampa 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entergy El Dorado 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.