Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Golden Harbor Assisted Living

Sheboygan, WI · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden Harbor Assisted Living runs at 444% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Golden Harbor Assisted Living: 16.9 TCR = 444% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden Harbor Assisted Living safety composite

Golden Harbor Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−45.7

2016→2018

Golden Harbor Assisted Living injury rate improved

Golden Harbor Assisted Living's TCR fell 45.7 from 45.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 45.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=45.7 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sheboygan, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.9 · 444% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #258/273
  • PHOTO Auberge at Lake Zurich
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auberge at Lake Zurich (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Golden Harbor Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden Harbor Assisted Living averages 16.9 TCR (444% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden Harbor Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=45.7 · 2017=5 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Golden Harbor Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #258 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Golden Harbor Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden Harbor Assisted Living
Golden Harbor Assisted Living (41 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Golden Harbor Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 45.7 18.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Sheboygan

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 138 employers in Sheboygan, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Lake Zurich 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isle at Watercrest Alamo Ranch 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morrow Heights Assisted Living 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottages at Edgewood 16.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunVest Solar LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mineral Point Operations Bldg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Construction Inc. - Ashland, WI 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger - P&G Green Bay 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Power Systems 1,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Energy Mosel 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheboygan 893 FTE
NAT-TCR Vita Craft Corporation 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Max & Erma's East Broad Street 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Center 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brightwood Center 16.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ross store 238 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location #4 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meherrin Chemical - Severn 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-MA-Agawam-Silver Street 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.