Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Alabama

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab

Auburn, AL · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab: 15.7 TCR = 241% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab safety composite

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−43.2

2022→2024

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab injury rate improved

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab's TCR fell 43.2 from 43.2 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=43.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Auburn, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 241% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #239/269
  • PHOTO Hillcrest Health Car…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hillcrest Health Care and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Lake Health & Rehab averages 15.7 TCR (241% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab TCR series: 2022=43.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbor Lake Health & Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #239 safest of 269 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Alabama.

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab (84 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Lake Health & Rehab
Arbor Lake Health & Rehab (84 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbor Lake Health & Rehab has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2022 43.2 43.2 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Auburn

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest Health Care and Rehabilitation Center 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bear Mountain Lowell LLC 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUMMIT HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING CO LLC 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astoria Healthcare Operations CO LLC 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Generation Fossil Greene County Steam Plant 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Jefferson Office 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prattville Headquarters 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Gunter Park Crew Headquarters 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briggs & Stratton 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-000017263 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 356 344 FTE
NAT-TCR US Fishing LLC 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryder 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Lake Village 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0531 Scarsdale 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE PHMG UGMC Clinics 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ring Container Hanover 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metals USA Plates and Shapes 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE PEC-Marble Falls 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.