Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Kansas

Cedar Lake Village

Olathe, KS · ~95 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Lake Village runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Lake Village: 15.7 TCR = 412% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Lake Village safety composite

Cedar Lake Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Cedar Lake Village injury rate improved

Cedar Lake Village's TCR fell 1.4 from 5.6 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 31.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=10.7 · 2020=31.6 · 2021=25.3 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Olathe, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 412% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #64/71
  • PHOTO Willow Towers
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willow Towers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Lake Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Lake Village averages 15.7 TCR (412% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Lake Village TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=16.7 · 2018=10.7 · 2020=31.6 · 2021=25.3 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Lake Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 71 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kansas.

Cedar Lake Village (95 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Lake Village
Cedar Lake Village (95 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cedar Lake Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2021 25.3 9.5 9 7 0
2020 31.6 17.4 12 8 0
2018 10.7 5.3 6 0 0
2017 16.7 3.3 10 0 0
2016 5.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · KS · Olathe

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 232 employers in Olathe, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willow Towers 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at The West End 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calusa Harbour 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Eatontown 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rylie Equipment & Contracting 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE TAMKO Building Products LLC - Phillipsburg 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fagron Sterile Services 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broderson Manufacturing Corp. 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garmin International - Olathe 7,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terracon Consultants Inc 4,405 FTE
CITY-NEAR DH Pace Company Inc. 893 FTE
CITY-NEAR TVH Parts Co. America's HQ 719 FTE
NAT-TCR Arbor Lake Health & Rehab 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0531 Scarsdale 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Griswold 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FV Northern Eagle 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Graphic Ink Corp 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE KI High Point, NC Plant 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE PetroCard Inc Kent 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.