Skilled nursing facilities · California

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Lodi, CA · ~231 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center: 16.5 TCR = 254% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center safety composite

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center: 5.0 → 28.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 71.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2021

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's TCR rose 22.9 from 5.0 in 2019 to 28.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 71.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lodi, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.5 · 254% of ind

  • DART 21.4 DART
  • RANK #663/739
  • PHOTO Park Central Care & …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~231 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Park Central Care & Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center averages 16.5 TCR (254% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=71.5 · 2021=28 · BLS 6.5

Where Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #663 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center (231 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center (231 employees, TCR 16.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Arbor Rehabilitation & Nursing Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 28.0 21.4 8 30 0
2020 71.5 5.2 16 81 0
2019 5.0 1.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Lodi

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 140 employers in Lodi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Park Central Care & Rehabilitation Center 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landings of Westerville 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RK#, LLC DBA/Addington Place at College Harbor 16.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECCFO 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE R&L CONTRACTING, INC 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layne Minerals LLC 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE Array Construction 231 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Terra Fina 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perez Farming Services Inc. 1,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHLM001 - HOSPITAL 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-223 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 592 890 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-6295-OUTLETS 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lile Relocation - Kent Branch 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CWPILL, Inc. dba College Works Painting 16.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Willmar HS Infant, Toddler & Preschool Center 16.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bear Construction Company 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roche Bros. Supermarkets - Westwood 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transtar Industries 231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Querencia Barton Creek 231 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.