Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Arbor View

Burlington, WI · ~32 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arbor View runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Arbor View: 8.8 TCR = 231% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arbor View safety composite

Arbor View scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.7

2016→2024

Arbor View injury rate improved

Arbor View's TCR fell 23.7 from 23.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 28.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=23.7 · 2017=4.6 · 2019=28.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Burlington, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 231% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #203/273
  • PHOTO Brookdale Arrowhead …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Arbor View in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arbor View averages 8.8 TCR (231% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arbor View TCR series: 2016=23.7 · 2017=4.6 · 2019=28.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Arbor View falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #203 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Arbor View (32 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arbor View
Arbor View (32 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Arbor View has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 28.6 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 23.7 23.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Burlington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 53 employers in Burlington, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Arrowhead Ranch 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woburn 3 Opec LLC DBA Country Club Heights 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tarzana 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sugarland Ridge, Elmcroft of 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Al's Apples Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2404-De Forest, WI (Monsanto Co.) 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mackville 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction - Sub & Trans 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle - Burlington 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Glass Inc Burlington 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Mayfield Consumer Products 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McKenzie Living 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Williamsburg Manufacturing 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HIROTEC Manufacturing America 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Demolition 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tonkawa Foundry, Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Security Services, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zotefoams Midwest 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.