Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills · Pennsylvania

ArcelorMittal Coatesville

Name: ArcelorMittal Coatesville Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Coatesville, PA · ~683 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.0
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ArcelorMittal Coatesville runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade B.

ArcelorMittal Coatesville: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ArcelorMittal Coatesville safety composite

ArcelorMittal Coatesville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2018

ArcelorMittal Coatesville injury rate improved

ArcelorMittal Coatesville's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Coatesville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

DART 0.6 DART
RANK #22/53
PHOTO Nucor Steel Brandenb…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 40 inj
SIZE ~683 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Steel Brandenburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

2
Nucor Steel Br

2
California Ste

2
O'Neal Manufac

2
Ghent Kentruck

2

What this shows ArcelorMittal Coatesville averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

ArcelorMittal Coatesville TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where ArcelorMittal Coatesville falls in its industry

416 Plate, iron or steel, made in establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 53 Plate, iron or steel, made in employers in Pennsylvania.

ArcelorMittal Coatesville (683 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ArcelorMittal Coatesville has more employees than the Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2018	1.7	0.6	11
2017	1.5	0.7	10
2016	2.9	1.4	19

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · PA · Coatesville

416 Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Coatesville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Nucor Steel Brandenburg	BRANDENBURG, KY	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	California Steel Industries	FONTANA, CA	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	O'Neal Manufacturing-Cedar Falls	CEDAR FALLS, IA	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ghent Kentrucky	GHENT, KY	2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	IKEA US Service Office	CONSHOHOCKEN	684 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Albright College	READING	682 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care	PHILADELPHIA	682 FTE
STATE-SIZE	HOME OFFICE - CENTERPOINT EAST	PITTSTON	681 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville	Coatesville	689 FTE
CITY-NEAR	ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500)	Coatesville	621 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265)	Coatesville	442 FTE
CITY-NEAR	81 - Valley	Coatesville	255 FTE
NAT-TCR	Exacta Aerospace	Wichita, KS	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Shopko Store #104 (Brigham, UT)	Brigham, UT	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	4818-48180021-6425 7th St. Ct. Sw-Wc	Cedar Rapids, IA	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Alvada Construction Inc	Alvada, OH	2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	MFG-Arecibo-Puerto Rico	Arecibo, PR	683 FTE
NAT-SIZE	CTA Acoustics, Inc	Corbin, KY	683 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wollborg Michelson Personnel Service, Inc.	San Francisco, CA	683 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wilsonart LLC	Temple, TX	683 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.