Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills · Pennsylvania

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville

Coatesville, PA · ~689 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade C.

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville safety composite

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2021→2023

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville injury rate improved

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville's TCR fell 1.9 from 4.1 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.1 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Coatesville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #29/53
  • PHOTO Moody Construction S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~689 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moody Construction Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville TCR series: 2021=4.1 · 2022=2 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville falls in its industry

416 Plate, iron or steel, made in establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 53 Plate, iron or steel, made in employers in Pennsylvania.

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville (689 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville
Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville (689 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville has more employees than the Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 0.9 17 0 0
2022 2.0 1.4 13 2 0
2021 4.1 2.9 14 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · PA · Coatesville

416 Plate, iron or steel, made in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Coatesville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moody Construction Services, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Riverdale 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR U.P. MACHINE & ENGINEERING 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerdau MFT 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Freshpet Kitchens Plant 1 and 2 - Bethlehem 689 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster East 689 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAP2 Fulfillment Center 691 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAR-ODFL 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR 81 - Valley 255 FTE
NAT-TCR WakeMed Apex Healthplex 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Plaza at Clover Lake 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Tavares 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gehl Foods, LLC. - Freistadt 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Lenox School District 122 689 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&B Group St Michael 689 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-GA 689 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5183 Knoxville Assembly 689 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.