Employer · Pennsylvania

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265)

Coatesville, PA · ~442 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265): 1.4 TCR = 44% of industry BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) injury rate improved

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Coatesville, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO General Atomics - Tu…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~442 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Atomics - Tupelo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) falls in its industry

390 industry establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 industry employers in Pennsylvania.

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) (442 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265)
Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) (442 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.2 4 3 0
2019 1.5 0.9 3 4 0
2018 1.2 0.7 7 0 0
2017 2.1 1.0 12 0 0
2016 2.1 0.9 9 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · PA · Coatesville

390 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Coatesville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Tupelo 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA022 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-B987 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2049 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP3 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE MedStaffers LLC 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 81 - Valley 255 FTE
NAT-TCR Fabri Cote 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ravenwood Golf Club 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2967-CO64 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schwartz Farms SE Misc MN 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4186-DC203 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freshway Farms LLC 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZAUS 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZHAY 442 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.