Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type · California

Arctic Cooling Systems

Chino, CA · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arctic Cooling Systems runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type workplace, earning a grade D.

Arctic Cooling Systems: 4.0 TCR = 191% of Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arctic Cooling Systems safety composite

Arctic Cooling Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2023→2024

Arctic Cooling Systems injury rate improved

Arctic Cooling Systems's TCR fell 3.5 from 5.8 in 2023 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.8 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 191% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #89/148
  • PHOTO Chicago Millard
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago Millard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Arctic Cooling Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arctic Cooling Systems averages 4.0 TCR (191% of the Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arctic Cooling Systems TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Arctic Cooling Systems falls in its industry

2,560 Refrigeration equipment repair establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 148 Refrigeration equipment repair employers in California.

Arctic Cooling Systems (80 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Arctic Cooling Systems
Arctic Cooling Systems (80 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Arctic Cooling Systems has more employees than the Refrigeration equipment repair and maint median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 5.8 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Chino

2,560 Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago Millard 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR L&S Electric, Inc. North 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joplin-12 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY JACKSONVILLE 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia River Knife & Tool 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DEN 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Caldwell Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CBSI Forestville 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Georgia Crate & Basket Co., Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richfield District Office 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Machine Works 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0688 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.