Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · Florida

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc.

Pensacola, FL · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade F.

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc.: 7.3 TCR = 259% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. safety composite

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.6 from 7.3 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=8.3 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pensacola, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 259% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #237/275
  • PHOTO Nelson Electric LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nelson Electric LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. averages 7.3 TCR (259% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=8.3 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #237 safest of 275 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in Florida.

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Armstrong Electric Company, Inc.
Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Armstrong Electric Company, Inc. has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2023 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2022 6.1 4.1 3 0 0
2019 8.3 8.3 7 0 0
2018 12.3 7.4 9 1 0
2017 7.3 2.9 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · FL · Pensacola

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 448 employers in Pensacola, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nelson Electric LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CableCom, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Electric LLC. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smart Energy Today, Inc. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mascotte 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCR Crist Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRV-Riviera Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Canaveral Plant 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Center 2,820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLPEN36 ASCENSION SACRED HEART PENSACOLA HOSP 2,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-FLPEN36 2,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pensacola Christian College, Inc. 2,259 FTE
NAT-TCR TPI Utuado 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DC2 Aberdeen 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Juice Company Memphis 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASV Wines, Inc. McFarland 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE D & L Tooling, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hornet Steel Buildings, Inc 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 117 Courtyard by Marriott 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.