Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts · Oregon

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc.

Portland, OR · ~111 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts workplace, earning a grade C.

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. safety composite

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc.: 2.7 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.64× in 2024

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc.'s TCR rose 3.5 from 2.7 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO GKN Aerospace Engine…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Newington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=0.8 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. falls in its industry

366 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Developing and producing proto employers in Oregon.

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. (111 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc.
Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. (111 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Arnprior Aerospace Portland Inc. has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 5.3 6 1 0
2017 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.7 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OR · Portland

366 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Newington 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce Crosspointe 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace Engine Systems, Manchester 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Aerospace USA - East Windsor 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Hines Growers 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Stair Corporation 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ascentron 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coherent, Inc. Wilsonville 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland FLooring 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wagner Hardwoods, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Katy Steel Co Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sargent Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pleasant Valley Healthcare and Rehab 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nob Hill 607-Salinas 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrington Court 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schuetz Container Systems - North Branch NJ 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.