Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc.

Blaine, MN · ~139 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc.: 8.4 TCR = 255% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. safety composite

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2022

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. injury rate improved

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 9.4 in 2018 to 8.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.4 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Blaine, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 255% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #21/29
  • PHOTO plainville plating c…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: plainville plating company, inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. averages 8.4 TCR (255% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.4 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=8.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 29 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Minnesota.

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. (139 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arrow Cryogenics, Inc.
Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. (139 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Arrow Cryogenics, Inc. has more employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.3 3.8 7 4 0
2021 10.9 4.4 15 0 0
2020 5.3 3.0 7 0 0
2019 8.1 2.2 11 0 0
2018 9.4 4.3 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MN · Blaine

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 163 employers in Blaine, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR plainville plating company, inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jenco Plating Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dura-Tech Processes, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Finishing Inc 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knife River Materials - Construction 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE New French Bakery- Kasota 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Fraser Bemidji 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bemis Healthcare Packaging - Mankato 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - Blaine 669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinite Campus, Inc. 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1832 - Blaine 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3498 352 FTE
NAT-TCR Suffolk Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 2578 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Flemington Department Store 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Novagard 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Ford 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cumming Packaged 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Bend - Police Dept 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.