Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing · Minnesota

Estee Lauder - Blaine

Blaine, MN · ~669 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Estee Lauder - Blaine runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Estee Lauder - Blaine: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Estee Lauder - Blaine safety composite

Estee Lauder - Blaine scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Estee Lauder - Blaine injury rate improved

Estee Lauder - Blaine's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Blaine, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO CB Fleet
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~669 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CB Fleet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Estee Lauder - Blaine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Estee Lauder - Blaine averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Estee Lauder - Blaine TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Estee Lauder - Blaine falls in its industry

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos employers in Minnesota.

Estee Lauder - Blaine (669 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Estee Lauder - Blaine
Estee Lauder - Blaine (669 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Estee Lauder - Blaine has more employees than the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2023 1.1 0.6 6 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.4 5 0 0
2018 1.2 0.8 8 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 7 0 0
2016 1.1 0.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · MN · Blaine

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 163 employers in Blaine, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CB Fleet 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR United-Guardian, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estee Lauder - 350 SSR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estee Lauder - Keystone 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Japs Olson - St Louis Park 670 FTE
STATE-SIZE PN1N ST LOUIS PARK 3800 BLDG 670 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norstan Communications, Inc. - EP/MPLS* 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlson Building Maintenance Corporate Office 667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinite Campus, Inc. 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1832 - Blaine 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3498 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8301 Carley 337 FTE
NAT-TCR Berkots 321 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt & Whitney North Berwick Parts Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WDC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RC Creations dba Acme Smoked Fish of NC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dresden Nuclear Power Station 669 FTE
NAT-SIZE Percheron Holdings, LLC 669 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altus Plant 669 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital Clermont 669 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.