Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · Michigan

Ascent Brands Manufacturing

Caledonia, MI · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ascent Brands Manufacturing runs at 442% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Ascent Brands Manufacturing: 14.6 TCR = 442% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ascent Brands Manufacturing safety composite

Ascent Brands Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.0

2023→2024

Ascent Brands Manufacturing injury rate improved

Ascent Brands Manufacturing's TCR fell 13.0 from 21.1 in 2023 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=21.1 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Caledonia, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 442% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #213/218
  • PHOTO DGP Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DGP Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Ascent Brands Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ascent Brands Manufacturing averages 14.6 TCR (442% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ascent Brands Manufacturing TCR series: 2023=21.1 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ascent Brands Manufacturing falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 218 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in Michigan.

Ascent Brands Manufacturing (53 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ascent Brands Manufacturing
Ascent Brands Manufacturing (53 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ascent Brands Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 8.1 4 0 0
2023 21.1 18.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MI · Caledonia

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 39 employers in Caledonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DGP Inc. 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stelray Plastic Products, Inc. 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Akro-Plastics 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TENNESSEE 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDL- Lansing Office 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Livonia 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Contractors, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GRR1 2,666 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Wood 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspen Surgical 348 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Salem Public Works 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Gables 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mack Reman 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mohawk Laboratories - Greenville 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sierra Bravo Contractors LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams Form Engineering Georgia 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Focused Care at Fort Stockton 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concentric Greensboro 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.