Landscape care and maintenance services · Colorado

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc

Colorado Springs, CO · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc: 15.7 TCR = 350% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc safety composite

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc: 3.1 → 19.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 24.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2024

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc's TCR rose 16.8 from 3.1 in 2020 to 19.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 24.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 350% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #76/84
  • PHOTO New West Lawngevity …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New West Lawngevity LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc averages 15.7 TCR (350% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc TCR series: 2020=3.1 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=24.7 · 2024=19.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 84 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Colorado.

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc (31 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc
Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc (31 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Aspen Leaf Landscape Maintenance Inc has fewer employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.8 11.9 5 0 0
2023 24.7 16.5 6 0 0
2022 15.3 0.0 4 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CO · Colorado Springs

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New West Lawngevity LLC 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosedale Hawthorne, NY 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Commercial and Residential Landscaping 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakes Area Landscaping LLC 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Strad USA Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heorot Power Management, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association-Pueblo West E&O 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton Service Center-275 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Salem-Lancaster #018 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR River Valley 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrington Factory 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Opco Inc, 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1839 Hin6 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rajala Timber Co 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 018 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.