Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center

Fort Recovery, OH · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center safety composite

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center: 1.8 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2023

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.8 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331523 · Fort Recovery, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #1/21
  • PHOTO Shiloh Pierceton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shiloh Pierceton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center falls in its industry

221 Die-castings, aluminum, unfini establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 21 Die-castings, aluminum, unfini employers in Ohio.

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center (74 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center
Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center (74 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Assembly/Packaging Plant & Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331523 · OH · Fort Recovery

221 Die-castings, aluminum, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 18 employers in Fort Recovery, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shiloh Pierceton 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACE INDUSTRIES Latrobe 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aludyne Montague, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme Alliance, LLC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Ohio Heifer Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE kILBARGER Construction, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steubenville Service Building 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lima Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheeseman LLC 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Recovery Industries 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turkey Service Building 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR J & M Manufacturing Co., Inc. 161 FTE
NAT-TCR Bennett Supply Co 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #516 CRYSTAL RIVER, FL 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Canterbury Enterprises, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Plant(Deep Rock Rd) 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sheepshead-Nostrand 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE PF Heritage SNF Ops, LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE NurseCore of Colorado Springs 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marie Esther Health Center Inc 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.