Reaming machines, metalworking, manufacturing · Minnesota

Micro-Matics

Fridley, MN · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Micro-Matics runs at 395% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Reaming machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Micro-Matics: 13.0 TCR = 395% of Reaming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Micro-Matics safety composite

Micro-Matics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Micro-Matics: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 36.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Micro-Matics's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 36.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Fridley, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 395% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO CPS Plant 5
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPS Plant 5 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Micro-Matics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Micro-Matics averages 13.0 TCR (395% of the Reaming machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Micro-Matics TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.6 · 2020=21.6 · 2021=36.5 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Micro-Matics falls in its industry

391 Reaming machines, metalworking establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Reaming machines, metalworking employers in Minnesota.

Micro-Matics (50 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Micro-Matics
Micro-Matics (50 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Micro-Matics has fewer employees than the Reaming machines, metalworking, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 11.8 9.8 1 5 0
2021 36.5 19.6 3 10 0
2020 21.6 14.4 2 7 0
2018 6.6 2.2 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MN · Fridley

391 Reaming machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fridley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPS Plant 5 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elemet Manufacturing, Inc 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards Manufacturing Company 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATACO Steel Products 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Star 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louriston 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Dublin 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center-UB 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,053 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operational Headquarters 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR US, MN Fridley, Cummins Power Systems 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Power Systems - Fridley 1,183 FTE
NAT-TCR Fremont Production 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Castalloy Group 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Glencoe Park District 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Facility Masters of Southern California 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE YESCO LLC - Denver, CO Establishment 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delmont Utilities, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rome Facility 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Market #457 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.