Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing · Michigan
CPS Plant 5
Fraser, MI · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 13.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
CPS Plant 5 runs at 399% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 13.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 12
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares CPS Plant 5's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
CPS Plant 5's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where CPS Plant 5 falls in its industry
429 Sheet metal forming machines m establishmentsSafer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.
Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 63 Sheet metal forming machines m employers in Michigan.
CPS Plant 5 has an average TCR of 13.2, which is 399% of the industry average (3.3) for Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing. This is significantly worse than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for CPS Plant 5
Between 2016 and 2017, CPS Plant 5's Total Case Rate worsened from 7.4 to 19.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 157% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 7.4, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 19.0, a spread of 11.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, CPS Plant 5 recorded 12 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from CPS Plant 5's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333517 - Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 63,257 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CPS Plant 5 (this establishment) | 13.17 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 333517 |
| Michigan state avg (all industries) | 4.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by CPS Plant 5 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 19.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on CPS Plant 5's reported OSHA injury record versus its Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 399% of the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing benchmark, CPS Plant 5 reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPS Plant 5's safety grade?
How many injuries has CPS Plant 5 reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Michigan - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~13.2)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.