CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services · New York

Atlas Automation Inc

Rochester, NY · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlas Automation Inc runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Atlas Automation Inc: 0.5 TCR = 90% of CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlas Automation Inc safety composite

Atlas Automation Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Atlas Automation Inc held a steady TCR band

Atlas Automation Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.5 · 90% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Hill-Rom Health Info…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hill-Rom Health Information Technology Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Atlas Automation Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlas Automation Inc averages 0.5 TCR (90% of the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlas Automation Inc TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Atlas Automation Inc falls in its industry

181 CAE (computer-aided engineerin establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 CAE (computer-aided engineerin employers in New York.

Atlas Automation Inc (35 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlas Automation Inc
Atlas Automation Inc (35 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Atlas Automation Inc has fewer employees than the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · NY · Rochester

181 CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hill-Rom Health Information Technology Solutions 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier System Integrators- Smyrna 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Markem-Imaje - Systech 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Business Systems LC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sandy Knoll Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY State Solar Farmingdale 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Facilities 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHTER+RATNER CONTRACTING CORP 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR KEWAUNEE 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR T.F. Hudgins, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Neotiss, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trac-Work, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Multi-Plastics Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amlings LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bryant Structures Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Operations 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.