Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · California

Auburn MLS

Auburn, CA · ~159 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auburn MLS runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade B.

Auburn MLS: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auburn MLS safety composite

Auburn MLS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Auburn MLS: 1.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2023

Auburn MLS's TCR rose 1.6 from 1.0 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Auburn, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #30/141
  • PHOTO Rocky River AAC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rocky River AAC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Auburn MLS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auburn MLS averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auburn MLS TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Auburn MLS falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 141 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in California.

Auburn MLS (159 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Auburn MLS
Auburn MLS (159 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Auburn MLS has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Auburn

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rocky River AAC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Technologies Manufacturing and Office 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Training Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilltop 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE REDDING SERVICE CENTER-OFFICE 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar4America Technology, Inc. 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Ana Creek Development dba Mark Company 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFShea Construction-Walnut 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR 0262 - Atlanta Ga (Dry) Depot 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wax Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Murray-Ward Contracting Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Exal Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Southwest Electric 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis SE Storage-TJ 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freeman Regional Health Services 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Tucson 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.