Hotels (except casino hotels) · California

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa

San Francisco, CA · ~377 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa runs at 689% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa: 20.7 TCR = 689% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa safety composite

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa: 28.3 → 129.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 129.2 TCR · DART/TCR 4.89× in 2024

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa's TCR rose 100.9 from 28.3 in 2022 to 129.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 20.7 · 689% of ind

  • DART 101.1 DART
  • RANK #1217/1298
  • PHOTO 108
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~377 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 108 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa averages 20.7 TCR (689% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa TCR series: 2022=28.3 · 2023=13 · 2024=129.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1217 safest of 1298 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in California.

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa (377 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa
Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa (377 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Downtown SoMa has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 129.2 101.1 21 2 0
2023 13.0 10.4 21 4 0
2022 28.3 22.7 16 65 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · San Francisco

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 108 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LQ0977 USF (near Busch Gardens) 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LQ2005 Los Angeles - LAX Airport 20.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bomel Construction Co., Inc. 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bon Appetit Danish 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE SIMWON America Corp 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gill Corporation 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Complete Care at Victoria Commons, LLC 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ME022MEM 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Shunk Office 20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Augustana Emerald Crest Minnetonka #415 20.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warrenville - Homebased 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE United General Medical Center 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota DC7 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uia Pro Ofc - Dhhs 377 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.