Chicken egg production · Indiana

Automated Egg Producers

North Manchester, IN · ~88 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automated Egg Producers runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chicken egg production workplace, earning a grade D.

Automated Egg Producers: 5.6 TCR = 124% of Chicken egg production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automated Egg Producers safety composite

Automated Egg Producers scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2016→2024

Automated Egg Producers injury rate improved

Automated Egg Producers's TCR fell 8.7 from 10.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112310 · North Manchester, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #14/25
  • PHOTO Weaver Bros. Inc. Ma…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Automated Egg Producers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automated Egg Producers averages 5.6 TCR (124% of the Chicken egg production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automated Egg Producers TCR series: 2016=10.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2 · BLS 4.5

Where Automated Egg Producers falls in its industry

351 Chicken egg production establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 25 Chicken egg production employers in Indiana.

Automated Egg Producers (88 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Automated Egg Producers
Automated Egg Producers (88 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Automated Egg Producers has more employees than the Chicken egg production median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2023 4.1 2.1 4 0 0
2022 3.5 2.4 3 0 0
2020 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2019 3.4 2.2 3 0 0
2018 11.7 7.2 13 0 0
2017 5.5 3.2 7 0 0
2016 10.7 5.3 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112310 · IN · North Manchester

351 Chicken egg production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in North Manchester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kurten Location 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daybreak Foods Inc. - Oakridge 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fieldale Farms - Stephen County hatchery 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2948_5705 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Municipal Services Division 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairchild Communication Systems, Inc 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE INDIV 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Church of the Brethren Home, INC dba Timbercrest Senior Living Community 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT MANCHESTER UNIV HAIST DINING 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Metals, Inc 118 FTE
NAT-TCR 1908 - Katy Cinnco Ranch 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2075 - Philadelphia Bridesburg 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR General Services 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Longwood Manor Convalescent Hospital 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dl Glover 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capitol Care, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&H Tool Works, INC - Richmond 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Products Co, inc. 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.