Chicken egg production · Indiana

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors

North Manchester, IN · ~122 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chicken egg production workplace, earning a grade D.

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors: 6.7 TCR = 148% of Chicken egg production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors safety composite

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2024

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors injury rate improved

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors's TCR fell 7.7 from 12.2 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.2 · 2017=10.0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=6.2 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112310 · North Manchester, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 148% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #17/25
  • PHOTO White County Egg Farm
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White County Egg Farm (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors averages 6.7 TCR (148% of the Chicken egg production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors TCR series: 2016=12.2 · 2017=10 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=6.2 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors falls in its industry

351 Chicken egg production establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 25 Chicken egg production employers in Indiana.

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors (122 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors
Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors (122 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors has more employees than the Chicken egg production median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 1.3 7 0 0
2023 3.9 2.6 6 0 0
2022 7.5 3.3 9 0 0
2020 6.2 4.4 7 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 7 0 0
2018 3.2 2.4 4 0 0
2017 10.0 2.7 15 0 0
2016 12.2 4.7 17 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112310 · IN · North Manchester

351 Chicken egg production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in North Manchester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White County Egg Farm 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lone Cactus Egg Farm 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DL Main 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Croton Pullet 2 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cort Acre Egg Farm 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 1 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan Cristiani Excavating 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Plainfield 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Church of the Brethren Home, INC dba Timbercrest Senior Living Community 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT MANCHESTER UNIV HAIST DINING 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Metals, Inc 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-TCR 1959 - Gilbert Gateway 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR John R. Hobbs Construction Co., Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegiant Air FNT 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Salubrious Wellness Clinic Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3305 - Burlington MA 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oostburg Concrete Products 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kiva Manufacturing Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Laurels of Hillsboro 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.