Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworking, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Automation Devices, Inc.

Fairview, PA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automation Devices, Inc. runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Automation Devices, Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automation Devices, Inc. safety composite

Automation Devices, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2024

Automation Devices, Inc. injury rate improved

Automation Devices, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333519 · Fairview, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Primetals Technologi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primetals Technologies USA LLC North East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Automation Devices, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automation Devices, Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automation Devices, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Automation Devices, Inc. falls in its industry

114 Cold rolling mill machinery, m establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Cold rolling mill machinery, m employers in Pennsylvania.

Automation Devices, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Automation Devices, Inc.
Automation Devices, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Automation Devices, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworkin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 13.7 0.0 2 1 0
2022 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.7 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.8 3.3 3 0 0
2017 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333519 · PA · Fairview

114 Cold rolling mill machinery, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Fairview, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primetals Technologies USA LLC North East 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR VRC Metal Systems, Box Elder 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Tech Machinery (Denver, CO) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RED BUD INDUSTRIES, INC. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE KNOUSE FRUITLANDS, INC. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Mushroom Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wharf 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAJ Mushroom 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parker White Metal Co. 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHB Machining & Molding 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIMM INDUSTRIES 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Technologies - Fairview Manufacturing 172 FTE
NAT-TCR 086/Yonkers 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Scarecrow Lath & Plaster 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zimbrick East Side 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 063 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MineARC Systems America 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hodge Electrical Contractors, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ouachita Fertilizer Company, LLC Monroe 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lindenmeyr Londonderry 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.