Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove

Wilmington, NC · ~204 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove: 8.3 TCR = 128% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove safety composite

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2017→2024

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove injury rate improved

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 27.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=19.6 · 2023=27.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wilmington, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #337/510
  • PHOTO Rio Grande City Nurs…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~204 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rio Grande City Nursing and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove averages 8.3 TCR (128% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=19.6 · 2023=27.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #337 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove (204 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove
Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove (204 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 27.6 27.6 3 21 0
2022 19.6 19.6 6 10 0
2021 0.3 0.3 5 24 0
2020 9.2 7.4 10 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 9 0 0
2017 9.6 7.7 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Wilmington

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rio Grande City Nursing and Rehabilitation 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greene Health and Rehab 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIVERSIDE VILLAGE 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Merrimack Valley 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Duke Lazzara Development 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yellow Dot Heating and Air, LLC 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creative Snacks Co. 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE BERKELEY GLOBAL NON-WOVENS 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR Times Supermarket - Honokowai 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Lawn and Garden 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TyKo Logisitics LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TJ Moore Lumber Yard Uvalde 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tower Hill Healthcare Center 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary of the Woods 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rail City Casino 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCSI-Transland 204 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.