Real estate rental or leasing of residential building · Florida

Avalon Park Group Management

Orlando, FL · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avalon Park Group Management runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Real estate rental or leasing of residential building workplace, earning a grade D.

Avalon Park Group Management: 2.2 TCR = 158% of Real estate rental or leasing of residential building BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avalon Park Group Management safety composite

Avalon Park Group Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Avalon Park Group Management held a steady TCR band

Avalon Park Group Management's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/48
  • PHOTO AH4R - Columbus
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AH4R - Columbus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Avalon Park Group Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avalon Park Group Management averages 2.2 TCR (158% of the Real estate rental or leasing of residential building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avalon Park Group Management TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Avalon Park Group Management falls in its industry

1,100 Real estate rental or leasing establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 48 Real estate rental or leasing employers in Florida.

Avalon Park Group Management (37 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Avalon Park Group Management
Avalon Park Group Management (37 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Avalon Park Group Management has fewer employees than the Real estate rental or leasing of residen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · FL · Orlando

1,100 Real estate rental or leasing of residential building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AH4R - Columbus 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne Residential Partners 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Star at Burgundy Place 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WRS 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE TransGro 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packinghouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Park Service Center 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gladiolus Service Center 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Novartis Technical Operations 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SUMMER STORM LLC dba Home instead Senior Care 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Hattan Derby 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Auto and Scrap Recyclers Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Satex Plumbing, inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Concrete Co.-Central Division 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trago Mechanical Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.