Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing · North Carolina

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division

Concord, NC · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division: 7.4 TCR = 225% of Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division safety composite

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2023

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division injury rate improved

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division's TCR fell 9.0 from 11.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.2 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 225% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Plant 4
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division averages 7.4 TCR (225% of the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division falls in its industry

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m employers in North Carolina.

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division (37 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division
Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division (37 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Johnson Concrete Co.-Piedmont Division has fewer employees than the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2020 6.1 4.1 3 0 0
2019 8.3 0.0 2 2 0
2018 11.2 6.7 4 1 0
2017 7.3 7.3 2 0 0
2016 11.2 7.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · NC · Concord

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 4 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angelus Block - TX 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMCO Bladensburg 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nox-Crete, Inc. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAR Greenhouse LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River CT/CC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE hep Petra, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR 302206 - WPAFB - Area A-1 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Lane Retirement Village 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Placer Food Bank 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Builders Supply Co Inc. 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Satex Plumbing, inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avalon Park Group Management 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trago Mechanical Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kludt Brothers Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.