Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · North Carolina

Novartis Technical Operations

Wilson, NC · ~279 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Novartis Technical Operations runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Novartis Technical Operations: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Novartis Technical Operations safety composite

Novartis Technical Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Novartis Technical Operations: 0.4 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2023

Novartis Technical Operations's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.4 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Wilson, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #42/47
  • PHOTO Aurora NPHS Manufact…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aurora NPHS Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Novartis Technical Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Novartis Technical Operations averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Novartis Technical Operations TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Novartis Technical Operations falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 47 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in North Carolina.

Novartis Technical Operations (279 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Novartis Technical Operations
Novartis Technical Operations (279 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Novartis Technical Operations has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2022 4.6 4.0 1 13 0
2021 2.7 2.4 7 2 0
2016 0.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · NC · Wilson

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Wilson, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aurora NPHS Manufacturing 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silarx Pharmaceutical 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coating Place Inc. Verona 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAPS New Jersey 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AHOSKIE 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEKAERTDESLEE USA INC WINSTON SALEM, NC 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auria Solutions 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Chain : West Jefferson, NC 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson (BAMG) 1,797 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Wilson 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde Aerospace & Defense 1,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP Wilson Medical Center 907 FTE
NAT-TCR Don Hattan Derby 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Auto and Scrap Recyclers Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Avalon Park Group Management 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SUMMER STORM LLC dba Home instead Senior Care 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE JBT Corporation - Orlando 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jena Choctaw Pines Casino 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa Maria Nursing Center 279 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.