Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Minnesota

Aveka, Inc.

Woodbury, MN · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aveka, Inc. runs at 826% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade F.

Aveka, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 826% of Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aveka, Inc. safety composite

Aveka, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Aveka, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Aveka, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 3.4 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Woodbury, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.1 · 826% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Biotrial
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biotrial (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Aveka, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aveka, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (826% of the Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aveka, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=8 · 2021=3.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Aveka, Inc. falls in its industry

319 Industrial research and develo establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Industrial research and develo employers in Minnesota.

Aveka, Inc. (69 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Aveka, Inc.
Aveka, Inc. (69 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Aveka, Inc. has fewer employees than the Industrial research and development labo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2020 8.0 4.8 5 0 0
2019 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MN · Woodbury

319 Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biotrial 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UH/OVPRI/OANRP 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culinary Engineering/NJ HQ 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHM/CTAHR/ADAP-PADO 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE WindLogics St. Paul 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Region Electric Cooperative 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Restoration Professionals, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field & Shop 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Services Group 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
NAT-TCR AmeriCare Plus - Lexington 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Alden Estates of Northmoor 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Knapheide Truck Equipment Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Probation Youth Guidance Center 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCO Orlando - 7100 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Theisen steel inc 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Excelsior Company 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.