Community social service program administration · Michigan

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C

Cadillac, MI · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community social service program administration workplace, earning a grade D.

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C: 4.1 TCR = 129% of Community social service program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C safety composite

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C: 3.5 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2021

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C's TCR rose 5.5 from 3.5 in 2019 to 8.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923130 · Cadillac, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO Behavioral Health
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Behavioral Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C averages 4.1 TCR (129% of the Community social service program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C TCR series: 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.9 · BLS 3.2

Where Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C falls in its industry

169 Community social service progr establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Community social service progr employers in Michigan.

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C (62 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C
Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C (62 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health-C has fewer employees than the Community social service program adminis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.9 1.8 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923130 · MI · Cadillac

169 Community social service program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 61 employers in Cadillac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Behavioral Health 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comstock Community Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watonwan County Human Services 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bullitt County-DCBS 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Land Company 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marshall 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Administration & Wastewater Operations 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombardo Homes of St Louis 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cadillac Hospital 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cadillac Casting, Inc 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1432 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1432 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Alden Estates of Northmoor 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Knapheide Truck Equipment Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Haleakala Labor Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aveka, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unique Pretzel Bakery, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tsh - Bc 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patterson Logistics Services 6 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Granada-Huntley-East Chain I.S.D. # 2536 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.