Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Missouri

AVMATS Jet Support

Chesterfield, MO · ~96 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AVMATS Jet Support runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade B.

AVMATS Jet Support: 3.2 TCR = 72% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AVMATS Jet Support safety composite

AVMATS Jet Support scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2021

AVMATS Jet Support injury rate improved

AVMATS Jet Support's TCR fell 2.2 from 5.5 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Chesterfield, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 72% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO AeroRepair Corp TX
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AeroRepair Corp TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AVMATS Jet Support in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AVMATS Jet Support averages 3.2 TCR (72% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AVMATS Jet Support TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 4.5

Where AVMATS Jet Support falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Missouri.

AVMATS Jet Support (96 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AVMATS Jet Support
AVMATS Jet Support (96 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

AVMATS Jet Support has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 5 0 0
2018 3.2 1.1 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.5 0.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MO · Chesterfield

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 126 employers in Chesterfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AeroRepair Corp TX 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - Component Repair & Overhaul 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFW 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 093 - Northeast Missouri 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGrath & Associates Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Semo Milling LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riviana Foods St Louis 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield, MO 5,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 3,689 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM MINISTRY OFFICE 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR CenturyLink 705 FTE
NAT-TCR South Valley Farms 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Halvor Lines Superior Terminal 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR American Rollup Door Company- Tampa 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Benton Co Physicians 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Layer Site 1 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Oaks Nursing Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adora 9 Operations, LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Osprey Packs, Inc. - Cortez 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.