Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston)

Houston, TX · ~160 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade B.

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston): 3.2 TCR = 72% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) safety composite

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston): 3.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.42× in 2017

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston)'s TCR rose 0.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #52/101
  • PHOTO AeroRepair Corp TX
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AeroRepair Corp TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) averages 3.2 TCR (72% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 101 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Texas.

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) (160 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - NASA AMOS (Houston)
DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) (160 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - NASA AMOS (Houston) has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 1.4 5 0 0
2016 3.0 1.8 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Houston

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AeroRepair Corp TX 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MHI RJ Aviation Inc. - Component Repair & Overhaul 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVMATS Jet Support 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANC-AFSC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LRM San Antonio 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc. 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Citgo Corpus Christi 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Crystal Transportation Services dba Guardian Logistics Solutions 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bekaertdeslee USA Inc Winston Salem, Nc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 030-Kansas City 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 4847-00 Whirlpool/Marion, OH 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S South Setauket, Ny 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S Medford, Ny 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison (Wimad) 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Urbana (Ilurb) 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.