Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis: 10.4 TCR = 314% of Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis safety composite

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis: 8.3 → 15.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2023

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis's TCR rose 7.3 from 8.3 in 2017 to 15.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 314% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Peninsula Powder Coa…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peninsula Powder Coating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis averages 10.4 TCR (314% of the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=15.6 · BLS 3.3

Where AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis falls in its industry

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Hot dip galvanizing metals and employers in Minnesota.

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis (43 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis
AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis (43 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

AZZ Galvanizing - Minneapolis has fewer employees than the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal pro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.6 7.8 10 0 0
2022 8.8 8.8 5 0 0
2021 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 11.3 9.1 5 0 0
2019 13.2 9.4 7 0 0
2018 11.3 9.4 6 0 0
2017 8.3 8.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MN · Minneapolis

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peninsula Powder Coating 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Coatings Inc. - Oshkosh 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROLLEX CORPORATION 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KORNS GALVANIZING INC 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR TownePlace Suites Pensacola FL 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Waccamaw Heating & Cooling, LLC 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0798 - Town Country 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrated Wood Components inc. 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Feed Processing Unit (Athens) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yankee Hill Machine 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron Star Urban BBQ 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.