Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Wisconsin

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83

Random Lake, WI · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade C.

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83: 3.0 TCR = 89% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 safety composite

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83: 5.2 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83's TCR rose 0.9 from 5.2 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Random Lake, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/126
  • PHOTO Calibrated Forms
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Calibrated Forms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 averages 3.0 TCR (89% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6 · BLS 3.3

Where Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 126 Offset printing (except books, employers in Wisconsin.

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 (21 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83
Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 (21 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Badger Tag and Label Corporation 83 has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · WI · Random Lake

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 13 employers in Random Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Calibrated Forms 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEWAUKEE WI 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flower City Group 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Rapids Corporation - Nexxa - LCI 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westby 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inguran LLC (dba STgenetics-Vienna Farms) 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALL ENERGY SOLAR MADISON WI 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Times Printing, LLC 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheridan Random Lake 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Krier Foods LLC 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant/Field Departments 64 FTE
NAT-TCR G.O. Services, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0233 Tyson - Portland 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR tkSCS Livermore Atlantis 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HNCFB02 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SA Recycling, El Monte 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ktec Cin 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Information Technology / Communications 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE IGPS Naperville 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.