Frozen fruit and vegetable processing · Wisconsin

Plant/Field Departments

Random Lake, WI · ~64 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plant/Field Departments runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Frozen fruit and vegetable processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Plant/Field Departments: 8.0 TCR = 241% of Frozen fruit and vegetable processing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plant/Field Departments safety composite

Plant/Field Departments scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2016→2023

Plant/Field Departments injury rate improved

Plant/Field Departments's TCR fell 11.6 from 14.3 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.3 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311411 · Random Lake, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 241% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO PNW Veg Co., dba Qui…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PNW Veg Co., dba Quincy Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Plant/Field Departments in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plant/Field Departments averages 8.0 TCR (241% of the Frozen fruit and vegetable processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plant/Field Departments TCR series: 2016=14.3 · 2017=10.9 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Plant/Field Departments falls in its industry

224 Frozen fruit and vegetable pro establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Frozen fruit and vegetable pro employers in Wisconsin.

Plant/Field Departments (64 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plant/Field Departments
Plant/Field Departments (64 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Plant/Field Departments has fewer employees than the Frozen fruit and vegetable processing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2022 6.1 2.0 6 0 0
2021 5.9 5.9 5 0 0
2020 3.5 1.2 3 0 0
2019 10.4 1.2 9 0 0
2018 9.8 2.2 9 0 0
2017 10.9 2.2 10 0 0
2016 14.3 1.3 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311411 · WI · Random Lake

224 Frozen fruit and vegetable processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 13 employers in Random Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PNW Veg Co., dba Quincy Foods 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suja Life, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paris Foods 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sakuma Bros Processing 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tomah, WI Receiving Station 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van's Lumber & Custom Builders INc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE PDC Facilities Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pretec Directional Drilling, LLC 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Times Printing, LLC 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheridan Random Lake 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Krier Foods LLC 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCHU WEST 52 FTE
NAT-TCR Pete's Fresh Market Oak Park Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Plastics 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VA 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR San Luis Ambulance 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merrill Gardens at the University 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Pointe Senior Living 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kashi Sales Facility 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA.PITTS.98 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.