Electronic guidance systems and equipment manufacturing · Virginia

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake

Chesapeake, VA · ~188 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electronic guidance systems and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake: 5.0 TCR = 150% of Electronic guidance systems and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake safety composite

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake: 1.2 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 22.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake's TCR rose 2.7 from 1.2 in 2018 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Chesapeake, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 150% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO BPW
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BPW (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake averages 5.0 TCR (150% of the Electronic guidance systems and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake TCR series: 2018=1.2 · 2019=1 · 2020=2 · 2021=22.5 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake falls in its industry

388 Electronic guidance systems an establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Electronic guidance systems an employers in Virginia.

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake (188 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake
BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake (188 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake has fewer employees than the Electronic guidance systems and equipmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.4 7 0 0
2023 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2022 3.1 2.3 2 2 0
2021 22.5 9.0 3 2 0
2020 2.0 0.5 4 0 0
2019 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2018 1.2 0.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · VA · Chesapeake

388 Electronic guidance systems and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BPW 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparton : Sparton DLS 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERG Aerospace Corp. CA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superalloy Manufacturing Solutions Corporation Plant 1 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ashland 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2017 - Dumfries 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1009 - Sterling 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1047 - Virginia Beach East 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR Marquart Bros, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ERI Fresno, Suite 104 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Fabricators, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park: Guadalupe 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Daly Computers, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tranysylvania Vocational Services, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Affy Tapple, LLC 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.