332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Georgia

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome

Rome, GA · ~226 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome: 2.5 TCR = 74% of 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome safety composite

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome held a steady TCR band

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.4 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Rome, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Trivium Packaging US…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Roanoke (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome falls in its industry

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light g establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 332431 Aluminum cans, light g employers in Georgia.

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome (226 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome
Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome (226 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome has more employees than the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.9 8 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 6 0 0
2022 2.8 2.0 5 2 0
2021 2.4 0.0 6 0 0
2020 3.5 0.9 3 5 0
2019 1.6 0.5 2 1 0
2018 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 1.0 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · GA · Rome

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 147 employers in Rome, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Roanoke 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shield Packaging of California 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Metalpack - Oakdale, CA 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Lid Plant 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Coastal Region 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roger Wood Foods 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grid Solutions : AIS - RMW - Waynesboro, GA, USA 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE 011-00699 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROME 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center 3,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Medical Center 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Healthcare Management Inc 2,741 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenfield 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Dupo 131 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 50093 - Capstone Winco Foods Woodburn 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cupertino Electric, Inc - San Jose Operations 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Littfin Truss Co 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston 165 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of La Verne 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scotch Plywood Company Fulton Division 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.