Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · California
Shield Packaging of California
Chino, CA · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.4
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Shield Packaging of California runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.
Shield Packaging of California: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Shield Packaging of California safety composite
Shield Packaging of California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
34/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 2.43 per 100 workers
Safer than 49% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 4.1 per 100 workers
Safer than 5% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Rising injury rate
Shield Packaging of California: 0.9 → 4.1 TCR
Peak year 2022 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2023
Shield Packaging of California's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.9 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 332431 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind
- DART 4.1 DART
- RANK #10/21
- PHOTO Ball Beverage Pkg 17…
- BOOK 6y book
- INJ 11 inj
- SIZE ~79 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Shield Packaging of California in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Ball Beverage
Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome
2.5 TCR
- Trivium Packag
Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Roanoke
2.5 TCR
- Ball Metalpack
Ball Metalpack - Oakdale, CA
2.5 TCR
- Riverside Lid
Riverside Lid Plant
2.5 TCR
- This site
Shield Packaging of California
2.4 TCR
What this shows Shield Packaging of California averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).
Shield Packaging of California TCR series: 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3
Where Shield Packaging of California falls in its industry
217 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta establishmentsSafer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta employers in California.
Shield Packaging of California has fewer employees than the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
332431 · CA · Chino
217 Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Ball Beverage Pkg 172 Rome | 2.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Roanoke | 2.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Ball Metalpack - Oakdale, CA | 2.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Riverside Lid Plant | 2.5 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC | 79 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | L E Cooke Co | 79 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | MOBI'S | 79 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa | 79 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 4078 | 2,902 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 8103 | 2,259 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | WM 4078 | 1,732 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | California Institution for Men | 1,680 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing | 2.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Ashley Pointe Hospitality | 2.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | ERA Industries, Inc. - Wheeling | 2.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Location 1- Manufacturing | 2.4 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Revolution Brewing | 79 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Sodexo at Mohawk Valley Cc | 79 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Bayou Chateau Nursing Center Inc | 79 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Hamburg IA (Bulk) | 79 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.