Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Maryland

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS)

Baltimore, MD · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS): 1.4 TCR = 53% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) held a steady TCR band

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Minnesota - 210
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota - 210 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) averages 1.4 TCR (53% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Maryland.

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS)
Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Baltimore, MD (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · MD · Baltimore

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota - 210 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Microbiz Security Company 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MYRTLE-CPIS-MYRTLE BEACH,SC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgeworth Integration, LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MDR 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keys Energy Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blakely Building 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 309-NiSource-Hagerstown MD 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Kraton Chemical, LLC - Dover 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Assurity Life Insurance Company 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Dominion Distributors 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Parsippany 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Conroe 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE AED - Youngstown 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saec Asc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panama City Beach 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.