Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills · Michigan

Bar Processing Corporation

Monroe, MI · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bar Processing Corporation runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills workplace, earning a grade F.

Bar Processing Corporation: 8.6 TCR = 261% of Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bar Processing Corporation safety composite

Bar Processing Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bar Processing Corporation: 0.0 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Bar Processing Corporation's TCR rose 11.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Monroe, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 261% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO Consolidated Metal P…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Consolidated Metal Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Bar Processing Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bar Processing Corporation averages 8.6 TCR (261% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bar Processing Corporation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=6 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Bar Processing Corporation falls in its industry

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re employers in Michigan.

Bar Processing Corporation (25 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bar Processing Corporation
Bar Processing Corporation (25 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Bar Processing Corporation has fewer employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 11.5 2 0 0
2023 16.7 12.5 4 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 1 1 0
2020 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2019 8.8 2.9 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · MI · Monroe

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 96 employers in Monroe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Metal Products 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMB Chicago 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coilplus CT 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazel Park 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayside Best Beans LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Blanchard 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Regional Hospital 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frenchtown 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau - Monroe Mill 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Power Plant 495 FTE
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #76 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Milford Fire Department - Station 8 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington 027 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tempco Manufacturing Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 517X 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fraser Construction Company 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Madisonville - Administration 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo King of Montgomery 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.