Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills · Indiana

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing

Pierceton, IN · ~166 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills workplace, earning a grade F.

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing: 8.8 TCR = 266% of Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing safety composite

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing: 7.8 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2018

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing's TCR rose 1.9 from 7.8 in 2017 to 9.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Pierceton, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 266% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO TMB Chicago
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TMB Chicago (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing averages 8.8 TCR (266% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=9.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing falls in its industry

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re employers in Indiana.

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing (166 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing
Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing (166 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Midwest Roll Forming & Manufacturing has more employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.7 5.3 20 0 0
2017 7.8 3.6 9 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · IN · Pierceton

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 8 employers in Pierceton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TMB Chicago 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bar Processing Corporation 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Metal Products 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bulldog Rack Company, Weirton 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creighton Brothers LLC. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herrman & Goetz, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATI Forged Products 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE EPC- Elkhart 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Medical - Cases & Trays - Pierceton 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pierceton - Cases & Trays 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Medical - Instruments & Implants - Pierceton 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pierceton - Instruments & Implants 249 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Residential - 1364 Midline Rd. 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashua NAS 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR UST, Inc Landmark Ceramics 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Leesville Auto 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Somerwoods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Labels - Clarksville 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nonn's Flooring Inc 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCY - Easton 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.