Oil field road construction · Michigan

Barry County Road Commission

Hastings, MI · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barry County Road Commission runs at 399% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Oil field road construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Barry County Road Commission: 11.2 TCR = 399% of Oil field road construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barry County Road Commission safety composite

Barry County Road Commission scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2016→2024

Barry County Road Commission injury rate improved

Barry County Road Commission's TCR fell 10.0 from 19.3 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.3 · 2017=21.3 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=21.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=9.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Hastings, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 399% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #119/139
  • PHOTO D9 Harrisburg Yard
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D9 Harrisburg Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Barry County Road Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barry County Road Commission averages 11.2 TCR (399% of the Oil field road construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Barry County Road Commission TCR series: 2016=19.3 · 2017=21.3 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=21.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Barry County Road Commission falls in its industry

4,078 Oil field road construction establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #119 safest of 139 Oil field road construction employers in Michigan.

Barry County Road Commission (51 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Barry County Road Commission
Barry County Road Commission (51 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Barry County Road Commission has fewer employees than the Oil field road construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 0.0 3 1 0
2023 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2022 5.2 2.6 1 1 0
2021 5.5 5.5 1 1 0
2020 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2019 21.6 0.0 8 1 0
2018 8.1 2.0 3 1 0
2017 21.3 5.3 5 3 0
2016 19.3 1.9 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MI · Hastings

4,078 Oil field road construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Hastings, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D9 Harrisburg Yard 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall County Highway Department 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR D1 Woodstock Yard 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cheboygan County Road Commission 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Pine Farms, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay County Waste Water Treatment Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Electric Service, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsdale County Road Commission 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR PENNOCK HOSPITAL - MICHIGAN 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flexfab LLC - Main 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Barry d/b/a Thornapple Manor 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viking Corp Hastings 296 FTE
NAT-TCR SGC-Florence 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S.R. Sloan, Inc. - Whitesboro, New York 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SFO Ice Cream 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Morton Grove Public Works 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Konell Construction & Demolition Corp 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reeves Piedmont Region Columbia 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Denver, CO 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.