Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · South Carolina

420 Charleston

North Charleston, SC · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

420 Charleston runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

420 Charleston: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

420 Charleston safety composite

420 Charleston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

420 Charleston: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 4.05× in 2024

420 Charleston's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · North Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #6/47
  • PHOTO City Electric of Pla…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Electric of Plainview, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

420 Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 420 Charleston averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

420 Charleston TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.8

Where 420 Charleston falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 47 Telecommunications equipment a employers in South Carolina.

420 Charleston (42 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 420 Charleston
420 Charleston (42 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

420 Charleston has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · SC · North Charleston

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Electric of Plainview, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KenMor : KenMor - Houston 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Communications, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transcon Company LLC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Transcon Company LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Halliburton Carrollton Manufacturing and Technology Facility 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bastion Technologies, Inc. - JPL 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MRS - Monroe 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 480 Manufacturing 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Depoe Bay Resort 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Bear 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holua 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.