Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Texas

Baytown Energy Center

Baytown, TX · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baytown Energy Center runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Baytown Energy Center: 0.9 TCR = 74% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baytown Energy Center safety composite

Baytown Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Baytown Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Baytown Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Baytown, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/86
  • PHOTO NRG Joliet Generatin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NRG Joliet Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Baytown Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baytown Energy Center averages 0.9 TCR (74% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baytown Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Baytown Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 86 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Texas.

Baytown Energy Center (26 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Baytown Energy Center
Baytown Energy Center (26 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Baytown Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Baytown

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 247 employers in Baytown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NRG Joliet Generating Station 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00734 BRIDGER COAL COMPANY UG MINE 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generation Fossil Barry Steam Plant - Alabama Power 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Belding Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Industries, L.P. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keeling Cattle Feeders 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Growth Olefins Recovery Project 2,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 1,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7042 1,288 FTE
NAT-TCR Main 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Enid Sc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Bend Sc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cortec Fluid Control 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 113 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermal Design Madison Net Zero 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hulett Environmental Services, Inc. - Fort Pierce Office 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08 Saginaw 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.