Insulation materials (except wood) merchant wholesalers · Nebraska

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero

Madison, NE · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero runs at 518% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Insulation materials (except wood) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero: 11.4 TCR = 518% of Insulation materials (except wood) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero safety composite

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero: 2.6 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 23.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero's TCR rose 8.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423330 · Madison, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 518% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO ABC Supply 026
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABC Supply 026 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermal Design Madison Net Zero averages 11.4 TCR (518% of the Insulation materials (except wood) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=23.4 · 2020=9.7 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Thermal Design Madison Net Zero falls in its industry

953 Insulation materials (except w establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Insulation materials (except w employers in Nebraska.

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero (26 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermal Design Madison Net Zero
Thermal Design Madison Net Zero (26 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7

Thermal Design Madison Net Zero has fewer employees than the Insulation materials (except wood) merch median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2023 10.3 3.4 3 0 0
2020 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2019 23.4 9.4 5 0 0
2018 11.3 5.7 2 0 0
2017 11.3 11.3 3 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423330 · NE · Madison

953 Insulation materials (except wood) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 8 employers in Madison, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABC Supply 026 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 373 ABC Supply Co., inc 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABC Supply Co Inc, 045 Orlando, FL 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABC Supply Co Inc, 059 Glendale, AZ 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Timber Ridge 12347 445th Street Leigh NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Willow Creek NE 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFF 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farners Pride - Battle Creek Location 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Plant 1,224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Ham Plant 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - MADISON 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI - 0129 Tyson Foods Inc. - Madison 77 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkland Health Center - Bonne Terre 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Products Gray Facility 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander Elementary 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Creek 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 113 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hulett Environmental Services, Inc. - Fort Pierce Office 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pasadena Power Plant 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baytown Energy Center 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.