Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Illinois

NRG Joliet Generating Station

Joliet, IL · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NRG Joliet Generating Station runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.

NRG Joliet Generating Station: 0.9 TCR = 74% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NRG Joliet Generating Station safety composite

NRG Joliet Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NRG Joliet Generating Station held a steady TCR band

NRG Joliet Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Joliet, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/28
  • PHOTO Baytown Energy Center
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baytown Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

NRG Joliet Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NRG Joliet Generating Station averages 0.9 TCR (74% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NRG Joliet Generating Station TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where NRG Joliet Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 28 Electric power generation, fos employers in Illinois.

NRG Joliet Generating Station (39 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NRG Joliet Generating Station
NRG Joliet Generating Station (39 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

NRG Joliet Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · IL · Joliet

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 281 employers in Joliet, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baytown Energy Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00734 BRIDGER COAL COMPANY UG MINE 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generation Fossil Barry Steam Plant - Alabama Power 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's El Paso 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Glen Nursery, Inc 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Bloomington 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Illinois Electric Cooperative 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Will 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 2,361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW2 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Joliet 2,089 FTE
NAT-TCR Crescent Park Corporation C-1 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Russellville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Iron Range Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling Fort Worth 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spicer Plus Inc 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE FGG Herndon 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Depot #6057 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casella Waste Services, Oneonta 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.