Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturing · North Carolina

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens

Hendersonville, NC · ~204 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens safety composite

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens injury rate improved

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.7 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.7 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313230 · Hendersonville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #5/42
  • PHOTO Bonded Fibers - Dela…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~204 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bonded Fibers - Delavan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Berkeley Global Non-Wovens averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Berkeley Global Non-Wovens falls in its industry

191 Pads and wadding, nonwoven, ma establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 42 Pads and wadding, nonwoven, ma employers in North Carolina.

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens (204 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Berkeley Global Non-Wovens
Berkeley Global Non-Wovens (204 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Berkeley Global Non-Wovens has more employees than the Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.3 1 1 0
2023 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2021 1.2 0.8 1 2 0
2020 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313230 · NC · Hendersonville

191 Pads and wadding, nonwoven, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 90 employers in Hendersonville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bonded Fibers - Delavan 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foss Performance Materials LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neenah Technical Materials Govt 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitesa 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Duke Lazzara Development 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yellow Dot Heating and Air, LLC 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creative Snacks Co. 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worldwide Protective Products 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Ridge Health 1,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Hendersonville 788 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1242 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1242 400 FTE
NAT-TCR Boxcar Press Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Maverick Tube Corporation 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heat Transfer Solution Texas 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PA Operations 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Regional Physician's Group 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Methodist Village Senior Living 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nexans High Voltage USA, Inc. 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conti Civil, LLC 204 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.