Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Alabama

Bessemer AT&T

Bessemer, AL · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bessemer AT&T runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

Bessemer AT&T: 1.0 TCR = 17% of Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bessemer AT&T safety composite

Bessemer AT&T scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2022

Bessemer AT&T injury rate improved

Bessemer AT&T's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Bessemer, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO South Coast Terminal…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Coast Terminals - WRF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Bessemer AT&T in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bessemer AT&T averages 1.0 TCR (17% of the Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bessemer AT&T TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Bessemer AT&T falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Private warehousing and storag employers in Alabama.

Bessemer AT&T (58 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bessemer AT&T
Bessemer AT&T (58 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Bessemer AT&T has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · AL · Bessemer

453 Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 116 employers in Bessemer, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Coast Terminals - WRF 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSIM 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 700 Distribution Dr (fka 680), Atlanta, GA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fair Knoll Hatchery 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Operations Center 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Professional Building Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105176 - Enviva Wood Pellet Plant EPC Epes, AL 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BHM1 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bessemer, DC 768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blox LLC 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR US PIPE - BHM-DIP 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Region 056 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles F. Day & Associates, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nucor Steel Kankakee, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Olsson Industrial Electric DBA Garrett Electric 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hams Well Service Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caravan Operations - Villa Serena Healthcare Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE idc-Automatic 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Dynamometer 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.